On 03/03/09 00:27, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 03/03/2009 01:18 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've put together some notes on upgrading a Fedora system from i386 to >> x86_64: >> >> http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/Fedora64bitUpgrade >> >> Feel free to edit the page with additional information, or move it to >> the Fedora wiki if it seems useful. >> >> > I can't edit (user is needed and I do not feel like creating one, Indeed, Grrr... did "AuthBasicProvider anon" break in apache 2.2.10? > so please fix the link to the F10 repo: > sed -i -e > "$fedora/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Pa$fedora/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages$" Thanks, fixed. > ref signatures: are you sure you were not hit by the transition of rpm > to sha256 ? (don't shoot the messenger, I am on x86_64 and I updated my > rpm in due time) I thought so, but "rpm -K foo.rpm" would reveal that the gpg verification did actually fail. The key gpg for i386 and x86_64 should be the same, but I couldn't import it from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ because "rpm --import" fails with the current version of rpm. It also fails on another F10 machine. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
