On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:03:54AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:53 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Some fallback (like an init script) should be included in any case, > > since some installations will obviously not be using NetworkManager. > > NM, when in use, can certainly push updated regulatory settings when > > necessary, over and above what the init script would do. > > > > So we should really have both. > > And if the system isn't going to use wireless at all, why spend the > bootup time to set something that will be of no use? I don't think we said we would do that. There are many ways to solve the problem while serving users. Here is my question: If we can provide a simple solution almost effortlessly, why tell anyone that might deviate from the otherwise approved configuration "suck it, roll your own"? John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@xxxxxxxxxx of your literate lifestyle. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
