On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 00:27 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"PM" == Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
PM> This is just totally bogus.
And yet somehow it matches reality and has helped on several systems.
I guess I'll leave the question of why to the experts. Sorry for
helping.
Apologies, I missed the fact that F11 alpha still had 4.6.0-rcX so
upgrading from fresh install of that would fail.
Maybe we should build rpm itself with md5 checksums for now (just a matter
of rebuilding with a spec override for the hash algorithm)?
That would be great. But we will need to do the same for other packages
that are pulled in on the 'yum update rpm' done on the F11 Alpha. Of
course if there are such other packages.
Yup .. which means db4, I dont think there are any other changed
dependencies between 4.6.0-0.rc3.2.f11 and now.
- Panu -
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
