Warren Togami (wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Michel Salim wrote: >> Granted that this is hopefully a rare enough scenario, but what will >> be the user experience of someone installing compat-broken-oss? >> >> - would a restart be required, or would the %post of the package load >> the required modules? >> >> - since it replaces alsa-plugins-pulseaudio, are there >> PulseAudio-aware applications that will fail over miserably if PA is >> not running? They probably should fall back to ALSA but we probably >> need a test plan in place. >> > > If you want to put work into that, go ahead. Otherwise, there is a > reason why it is named compat-BROKEN-oss-sound. > > Really few people will ever need this package because padsp emulation > works in most cases. I'd think it may just be simplest to remove the lines from modprobe.conf.dist, and not really worry about a new conflicting package unless there turns out to be a big need for it. AFAIK, we shouldn't need such a package for anything in Fedora itself. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
