Re: Noarch subpackage problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> I think we'll see substantial savings from allowing through things that
>> meet a heuristic while still placing the burden of checking this onto an
>> automated tool instead of a human.
> 
> Automated checks will always misfire and annoy the heck out of packagers. I
> don't think it's Koji's job to do this kind of checks.
> 
Sure they'll misfire and sure they'll annoy packagers.  But will they
annoy packagers more than FPC making a Guideline like "Every package
with noarch subpackages must be scratch-built in koji and checked to
make sure the noarch rpm's are the same"?

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux