On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:22 +1100, Roy Rankin wrote: > My understanding is that the main reasons for the new requirement that > fonts be in a separate package were better license visibility, better > sharing of fonts, and to save the user from downloading stable fonts > just because the code changes. And in my case, as the font is in the > source tar ball a sub-package is indicated. > > I gave the font sub-package its own version so code changes would not > require installing a new font package, and this "protects" the version > number from rpmdev-bumpspec. However, It looks like doing this is not > consistent with the Fedora build system. > > Is there a way to achieve what I want that will work? It looks like there is already another package that is providing 'denemo-music-fonts','4.10','1.fc11'. There can be only one. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
