Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 17:53 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Anytime you add things that the packager has to understand and has to do >> you add a step where things can be forgotten or misapplied. Right now, >> we have the ability to start with a small set of files that are >> allowable in noarch subpackages and add more as we figure out heuristics >> to allow things that we are pretty certain are correct. (%doc, *.py, >> etc). Once this is out there for a while, the only thing we can do is >> impose additional burden on reviewers and packagers as it's much harder >> to take back a feature than it is to parcel it out a little at a time. > > > Perhaps these thoughts should have been brought up when this feature hit > RPM and when it was talked about MONTHS ago, rather than waiting until > after we've done all the work to make it live and in use. > I agree, that would have been good. But I was under the mistaken impression that we were going to be doing a lot more checking of the built files than became apparent today. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
