Re: Status of gconf -> dconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bastien Nocera wrote:
> As for propagating new defaults, or mandatory options (like GConf is
> able to do), I don't see how a one-file-per-option would solve that
> problem.

All you need there is a config file search path, e.g.:
[kevin@localhost ~]$ kde4-config --path config
/home/kevin/.kde/share/config/:/etc/kde/:/usr/share/kde-settings/kde-profile/default/share/config/:/usr/share/config/

Mandatory settings could be implemented by either:
* prepending something like /etc/mandatory to the search path or
* having a way for the later entries in the path to contain forced settings.
(AFAIK, the latter is how KDE's kiosk support works.)

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux