On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 15:35 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote: > I didn't say DConf, or the current GConf implementations were good, I > said that one-small-file-per-config-option is absolutely unworkable. What's this /proc/sys/ thing... Yes, current filesystems are not optimized for lots of small files. But absolutely unworkable? That's absurd. > As for propagating new defaults, or mandatory options (like GConf is > able to do), I don't see how a one-file-per-option would solve that > problem. You solve that problem the way it's been done for decades. Config files in /etc/ that override anything the user sets. The on-disk format isn't even relevant to this particular problem.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
