On Wednesday 18 February 2009 21:14:57 Kevin Kofler wrote: > In principle, libc_nonshared.a etc. all fall under the "what if only a > static library is provided" policy, so if the guideline was enforced for > glibc, every single package containing compiled code would need to BR > glibc-static (or rather glibc-nonshared-static or something like that to > distinguish it from a true glibc-static subpackage which should be what > ships libc.a) because it links libc_nonshared.a. Surely either the compiler, or binutils, would need to have that as a Requires: rather than every package that's built with gcc (especially since it's not the program itself that *has* that requirement, it's the toolchain). > Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
