Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 17:53 -0500 schrieb seth vidal: > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:39 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:37 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > > Bottom line is that while it's certainly within anyone's rights to add > > > their new login manager, it's also within the rights of the people > > > working on the desktop to close any bugs filed by people using > > > something else WONTFIX. > > > > I think its fair for the project to define what it takes to be a > > supported login manager, and if your login manager doesn't meet those > > requirements, then the issues don't get looked at, etc... > > "Supported" We don't provide support anyway. Obviously... I filed three bugs against gdm, none of them got fixed, in fact they are all in state NEW or were closed by the bugzappers. IIRC none of them even got a single comment from the maintainer. That's what I call a supported login manager. ;) Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
