Re: 586 vs 686

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 19:04 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, see the 586 packages come out in rawhide.  And was just paying
> attention to my kernel, and noticed it was 586 as well, and not 686 that
> it used to always be up to F11.  So, is 586 it now for low end and high
> end, even kernel?
> 
> If this was discussed, specially during the almost 2 week power outtage
> couple weeks ago, point me to the URL and will gladly read on it.


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ArchitectureSupport

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project          (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
identi.ca               (http://identi.ca/jkeating)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux