On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:19 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:17 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On 2009-02-18 at 17:14:12 -0500, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The other thing to we should do is to strongly discourage people from > > > adding more of them to Fedora. There's not a really good reason for > > > anything other than gdm and kdm to be included and supported. > > > > I'm not sure I buy this argument. Who gets to say what use cases are > > interesting to the Fedora Community? What if the next great window > > manager isn't GNOME or KDE? > > > > Sure, maybe other "dm"s might not make it into the default Fedora spins, > > but lets not start "strongly discouraging" people from writing new code > > and putting it in Fedora. > > I'm sure you are going to make the same argument when rpm5 comes up for > inclusion again... rpm5 that does not conflict with rpm nor attempt to trump the provides for rpm? B/c that was the problem before. I know what upstream yum has said about rpm5 what has upstream gnome said about using other lm to start gnome? -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
