Re: Proven Packager help for Nethack?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



is this change needed for F-10 and F-9 too ?


On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt <Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruno Wolff III schrieb:
>> But for now I'd be happy if someone would add in the missing Requires.
>>
> Done.
>
> Best Regards:
>
> Jochen Schmitt
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmcW4gACgkQT2AHK6txfgyVKACeK6ua4Cdc5LodhFaw8qhVNs/0
> 98MAn2QnfhzCEB184QAVygM8aasY4mW6
> =pw6q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



-- 
------------

Itamar Reis Peixoto

e-mail/msn: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
sip: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux