Le Mer 18 février 2009 08:44, Conrad Meyer a écrit : > The guidelines say that any package providing static libs needs to > Provides: - > static subpackages, and that packages linking with static libs at > compile time > need to BR the -static subpackage, not -devel (even if it's the same > package). > Thus any package not doing this needs to be fixed. It took mass bug filling for people to start applying guidelines for fonts and while the response of some packagers has been great others have not even looked at two months later. (Though, of course, refusing to make it a F11 feature or a review check like -static is not helpful) And fonts do not present only technical problems but also legal ones (we've found *MS* fonts in the repo when we started looking!). And the Fedora 11 font autoinstall feature depends on packagers cleaning up their mess before release time. (Before people affirm our font guidelines were only changed this fall, the licensing parts have been in force for years and we've asked to split fonts last summer. What happened in January was just a more imperative rewording of precious policy) So "the guidelines say so" without any enforcing effort is not effective. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
