Bill Nottingham wrote: > Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> > Provides: login(display) >> >> What about: >> Provides: runlevel(5) > > If at some point in the future, runlevel becomes a meaningless construct, > that dependency may not be logical. > > 5 is, after all, an arbitrary tradition that isn't even required by > the LSB. Provides: bikeshed(loginmanager) -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
