-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robert Marcano schrieb: > I have a new update of "svnkit" ready to be submitted (package already on > Fedora) but this new version includes an Eclipse plugin that will be needed > by an updated eclipse-subclipse. I am using svnkit-eclipse but this will > break the standard naming of those pluging packages (eclipse-*). SVNKit is a > Java library that can be used outside of eclipse so I do not want to remove > the base svnkit package and rename everything "eclipse-svnkit". > > I think an exception can be made on this case, opinions? > I thnk you should call the common part svnkit and the part for the eclipse plugin eclipse-svnkit. Of course the eclipse-svnkit subpackage should have a Req. to the svnkit main package. Best Regards: Jochen schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmZwScACgkQT2AHK6txfgxg8gCgwteiz6z8TC40BeXZgszi3EPw I0kAoMcqNoCv6tMBNqkt2Vt96z0SecbX =07Hv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
