Re: Heads up: Noarch Subpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> What we needed for OCaml was a noarch main package and arch-specific
>> subpackages.  Is this now possible?
>
> Out of curiosity: What is speaking against just creating one or several  
> -common noarch sub packages?

Nothing really, except that we'd have to change the OCaml packaging
guidelines and modify every one of the 70-or-so packages in Fedora.

Previously noarch subpackages weren't available at all which is why
the packaging guidelines don't cover this case.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux