Casey Dahlin wrote:
Casey Dahlin wrote:
Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 06:13:56 pm JD wrote:
I had asked the fedora-list for help regarding building
the latest stable kernel 2.6.28 in FC7. But no one came
up with the answer to this problem:
No one cares, because F7 (there is no "core" in F7!) has been
unsupported for quite some time. Upgrade or fix your own problems.
Regards,
Attitude, gentleman, attitude!
He is right, though. The release is unsupported. Since you're here
though, I'd check that root=LABEL part. It doesn't look quite right.
Where by not quite right I mean that /l is a funny thing to name a disk.
--CJD
Actually, I had not labeled it that.
The installation I believe.
What should the label be?
Here is the fstab:
LABEL=/1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
LABEL=SWAP-sda3 swap swap pri=1 0 0
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
I tried to build mkinitrd version 6.0.77. But
rpmbuild dies as follows:
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/var/tmp/mkinitrd-root
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/bdevid.so
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/var/tmp/mkinitrd-root/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bdevid.so
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/bdevid.so
I have python installed:
python-devel-2.5-15.fc7
python-2.5-15.fc7
python-libs-2.5-15.fc7
What's causing the above complaint?
Does it mean that the file
/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/bdevid.so
is not supposed to exist?
Cheers,
JD
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
