Re: Heads up: Noarch Subpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe Orton wrote:
I take it from the wiki page, that we should hold of on using this too aggressively until some distro-wide guidelines are produced?

e.g. for -devel packages given that 99% of the content is generally noarch-able there would be a lot of scope for splitting those up.

...except for the important symlinks-to-versioned-.so's? Doesn't that kind of break things for -devel unless you break it into -devel-libs and -devel-headers (eek :-( )?

I was thinking -doc would be more likely candidates :-).

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
Here endeth the rant... which I realize is not likely to Win Friends or Influence People, especially the person to whom it was directed.
  -- Charles Wilson (generalized)

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux