Re: Orphaning homestead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:01:20AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> 
> > Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> Instead of orphaning and doing a new review, couldn't it simply be
> >> renamed, and use a versioned Obsoletes?  Is it really just a new name,
> >> and
> >> otherwise drop-in compatible?
> >
> >
> > Current policy-ish stuff says that it must go through a new package
> > review, for lack of a more streamlined process yet. See last week's
> > FESCo meeting notes for gory details...
> 
> My bad.  So it does need the new review, but not orphaning of the old
> package?

Wasn't there a new policy discussed at FPC or Fesco about this
recently?  So renamed packages could just be renamed without going
through a complete review?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux