Re: olpcsound

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I've been dealing with all sorts of OLPC related packages. See the
fedora-olpc list.. The reason they're in F-10/rawhide is because
that's the way OLPC is headed. By F-11 there will be very few (if any)
forked packages for OLPC. So as such no direct role with olpcsound but
I have fixed a few and filed a few bugs against it. I have spoken to
(one of) the maintainers of it at some stage. Why do you ask?

Peter

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Peter!  (Cc fedora-devel-list)
>
> What is your role with regard to the "olpcsound" package?
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/olpcsound
>
> You are not listed as co-maintainer.
> You don't seem to notice the bug reports,
> but you did the builds for Fedora 10 and Rawhide.
> The bugzilla assignee doesn't know why the package is in F10 and Rawhide.
>
> Please clear this up.
> Thank you in advance,
>
> --
> Michael Schwendt - mschwendt fedoraproject org
> Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide) - Linux 2.6.29-0.64.rc3.fc11.i686
> loadavg: 4.16 3.97 4.24
>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux