Peter Robinson wrote: >>> Back in October, I reported a kernel bug against rawhide: BZ#467457. I >>> submitted a one-line patch which was accepted upstream in November. Here >>> it is 3 months later and I still can't install F10 on this hw because >>> that fix is not in F10. So what is the process for getting a kernel bug >>> fix into fedora? >>> >>> --Mark >> well, looks like it went into 2.6.28 but unfortunately (for you, >> anyway!) that kernel got skipped in F10. > > What was the reason for skipping 2.6.28 for F-10? > > Peter > http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx/msg01716.html > Skipping 2.6.28 for F8 and F9 > > Chuck Ebbert > Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:42:36 -0800 > > 2.6.28 has turned out to be a bit buggy. Also 2.6.27 has been chosen to be > a long-term supported kernel upstream. This means we can leave F9 and F10 > on .27 and concentrate on getting .29 into shape for F10 and F11. With the > extra resources available from not trying to fix up .28 we can make .29 even > better. > > Comments? > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-kernel-list mailing list > Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
