Re: Fedora EOL Security Updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gustavo Alves wrote:
> This is not about a long term support, but a longer one. In my opinion, 18
> months cycle is too short. One or two versions more will be enough to a
> comfortable upgrade plan.

The length of support for a Fedora release is actually around 13 months, not
18.

> The majority of bugs from a version are untouched. Since F9 elisa doesn't
> work. Since EVER we have that annoying rpm freeze. If you press CANCEL on
> NTP connection at "firstboot", it will be run again on restart. It's so
> many bugs uncorrected that I even care anymore to lost my time puting on
> bugzilla.

But the project proposed in this thread is *only* for security updates, in
particular any other bugs will *not* be fixed under this proposal. So it
doesn't really change anything there.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux