Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But several upstreams say they tried and it didn't change anything or even
> made things worse. And it'll be consuming more memory, both RAM and disk
> space. I'm not convinced it is a good idea.

Can you distill that down into a set of prioritized benchmarks. If
someone were going to play around with optimization switches. What are
the minimum matrix of obtainable benchmarks that such an effort would
have to meet in order to be considered a credible test?

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux