Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Meeting minutes and full logs of the 2009-02-03 FPC meeting are > online: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes/20090203 > > Summary: > > The following drafts are now official guidelines, having been accepted > by FESCO last week: > > > * Updated Haskell Guidelines - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell > * Symlinks - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks > > These should be written into the guidelines soon if this hasn't > already been done by the time you read this. > > Issues pending FESCO ratification: > > * Resubmission of the Non-obvious spec file items draft - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Non-obvious_spec_file_items > Hopefully addressing FESCo's concerns. > We also have a modified: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires This splits the "comment for non-obvious items" and Explicit Requires sections so we can treat them as separate issues for ratification. Sorry for the confusion. -Toshio > Misc business: > > * PHP guideline modifications for dealing with channels - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP > o FPC requested additional cleanups and clarifications. > > * ReviewGuideline for fonts - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ReviewGuideline_for_fonts_(2009-01-22) > o FPC did not accept the draft. > > - J< >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
