On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:16:59PM +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 12:57 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote: >> > I've recently spent quite some time on researching and testing what >> > things we can do to make power management better in Fedora. For that >> > reason i've opened a Feature request for F11 with the basic stuff that >> > i think is doable for that release. >> >> In the version of g-p-m and DeviceKit-power in rawhide, you can see some >> new stuff like this: >> http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/01/30/gnome-power-manager-and-processor-wakeups/ >> >> It's basically a DBUS interface and session viewer for the data. > > Isn't dbus actually known bad for the battery? Something about > client-level filtering waking up too many clients for every message? > Or was that fixed? Well, sending the data does cause a wakeup, yes. The interface stops polling if there's no client connected. To be honest, a few wakeups every 5 seconds is nothing compared to firefox and npviewer.bin. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
