Re: RFC: Disabling blinking cursor by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > If you really wanted to save serious power, you'd stop inducing or forcing
> > > people with less power hungry old systems (i586 ring a bell?) to replace them
> > > with considerably hungrier newer systems. New systems make much better room
> > > heaters than old systems, because they use a lot more power, far more than
> > > one extra watt. Support for old systems == really substantial conservation.
> > 
> > Isn't it odd then, that each new system I buy happens to use lower power
> > over time than previous systems?
> 
> Including manufacturing cost, that's not entirely true.

No, but that's not what the poster suggested. Heck, I went from
a 5-year old Athlon64 server to an Atom based one, and cut
the power usage by a factor of over 5.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux