Re: Moblin 2 and Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:25:37 -0900
Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hmm, is there a good way to generate a list of changes between moblin
> and Fedora packages that would help us identify some specific things
> we could get back?  Is this a matter of cataloging the Moblin specific
> patch files in the Moblin srpms?

as I said before, the things we borrow we don't tend to patch
> 
> The other question is, does the way Moblin "borrow" packages from
> Fedora fall under the newish Fedora Remix trademark guidance?

I doubt it. I really don't consider Moblin "fedora + changes". It
really isn't. It is much more a "New OS + borrow from Fedora and SuSE"
I suspect (I haven't done the count) that less than half the packages
fall under the "borrow from Fedora" umbrella.
Probably more if you don't count applications.

>  And if
> so would Intel be willing to advertise (in some fashion) Moblin as a
> Fedora remix?

I don't think that is currently a relevant question...



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux