On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:01:54 -0500 Susan Lauber <laubersm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greetings to the authors/maintainers of Package Maintainer wiki pages, > > I introduced myself last week [1] and since then I have dug into the > pages and set up a task table [2] Greetings! > I have already added a category to most pages so they can all be found > together [3]. > If there are others or if you create a new page just add the string > [[Category:Package Maintainers]] to the bottom of the page. > > The next step is renaming so that pages are easier to find in a > search. It will also make the category page easier to use. I have > started making suggested in the packagemaintainers.psv [4] file in > the wikirename.git repo and > > ***I encourage others to check the proposed names and offer additional > suggestions.*** ok. Here's my suggestions: --- a/packagemaintainers.psv +++ b/packagemaintainers.psv @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ PackageMaintainers/CvsAccess|CVS access for package maintainers #PackageMaintainers/FC6Status|Archive:PackageMaintainers/FC6Status PackageMaintainers/FEver|Using FEver to track upstream changes PackageMaintainers/HelpWanted|Help wanted for package maintainance -PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored|How to get a package sponsored +PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored|How to get a sponsored into the packager group PackageMaintainers/InProgressReviewRequests| PackageMaintainers/Join|Join the package collection maintainers #following Main* are included in other pages @@ -30,13 +30,15 @@ PackageMaintainers/MainPagePackaging| PackageMaintainers/MainPageUsers| PackageMaintainers/MaintainerResponsibility|Package maintainer responsibilities #following needs love - I can't tell a good name from content. -PackageMaintainers/Makefile|Handling the Makefile +#This is out of date and 'make help' should be used instead anyhow - kevin +PackageMaintainers/Makefile|Archive:PackageMaintainers/Makefile PackageMaintainers/MockTricks|Using Mock to test package builds PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess|New package process for existing contributors PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages|Orphaned package that need new maintainers PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife|How to remove a package at end of life PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus|Package status #archive the following CompsF*Missing ? +#yes, I would think so - kevin PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF10Missing| PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF7Missing| PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF8Missing| @@ -47,7 +49,8 @@ PackageMaintainers/Policy|Package maintainer policy PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL|Policy for package lifecycle PackageMaintainers/Policy/EncourageComaintainership|Policy for encouraging comaintainers PackageMaintainers/Policy/FESCoElections|FESCo election policy -PackageMaintainers/Policy/KernelModules|Packaging kernel modules +# should be removed, no longer applicable +PackageMaintainers/Policy/KernelModules| PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers|Policy for nonresponsive package maint PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews|Policy for stalled package reviews > I would like to have this file ready for the wikibot by the end of > the week (Feb 7). > Lack of response will be seen as a vote of confidence :) Excellent. Thanks for looking at this! > Thanks, > Susan kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
