Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> Guessing some software (codecs?) may fallback on 64-bit to unoptimized C code
> instead of some assembly one but Fedora would at least show the usefulness of
> the updates of such software for the x86_64 arch.

Try GLIBC:  For example, x86_64 exp() (and expf()) is *much* slower
than x86.  (At least as of my testing in Fedora 9, I haven't measured
F10… the point being that these differences can lurk in unexpected
places.

They need to be fixed in anycase, but useful to keep in mind.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux