Re: Too many unowned directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, den 30.01.2009, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
> |
> | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
> | create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
> | does create that directory.
> |
> | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
> | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
> 
> Despite being in the guidelines as above, more and more unowned
> directories are found in Fedora/Rawhide.
> 
> They spring up like mushrooms.
> 
> There must be reviewers and packagers who don't understand above
> guideline and who are not familiar with how to include files vs. directories
> in RPM package %files lists.

This underlines what I said recently about the quality of (at least some
of) the latest reviews.

Can you give me a list of packages and/or bugs so I can start working in
that?

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux