Re: Unresponsive Maintianer: salimma

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas wrote:
> No, it doesn't qualify, since the maintainer is known to be active.

It does. A maintainer can be active and still neglecting some packages.

Still, there ought to be a better solution. Comaintainership?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux