Le jeudi 29 janvier 2009 à 19:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > People who want TEX kept should create a task force and feed TEXlive > > 2008 in rawhide bit by bit, checking for each bit the licensing is ok. > > That's about the only way the burden of checking TEX can be distributed > > enough it won't depend on a couple packagers, when the amount of work is > > too much to be humanly doable by a few people alone in a realistic > > timeframe. > > I don't think that makes sense: > * Modular packaging is a lot more work than monolithic packaging. > * If we import TeXlive 2008 piecemeal, we'll have a Rawhide with a broken > mix of a monolithic 2007 package and incomplete split 2008 packages. > > We have to upgrade 2007 to 2008 and this should not be blocking on a license > review. No other packages get a license audit on each upgrade, I don't see > why TeXlive should be any different. One of the changes in TeXlive 2008 is it's supposed to be modular upstream now. Bundling a modular upstream in a single fedora package is generally a bad idea -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
