Re: alsa x 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> I really do not understand why not going straight to 1.0.19
> instead of patching 1.0.17 again. I agree alsa-1.0.18
> had a lot of problems, but the fixes are in alsa 1.0.19.

I also think reverting is usually a bad solution, move forward, not
backwards. The reversion probably reintroduced some bugs that 1.0.18 had
fixed and regressed hardware support. That said, I don't know the specifics
of this case: are we sure 1.0.19 fixes the regressions?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux