On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 06:41:14PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > - It introduces a spec incompatibility, which can be taken care of in > > Fedora land but not so easy for EPEL side of things. Dunno if our > > buildsys ever does anything with the rpmbuild of the host system > > (I seem to recall it doing some part there but could easily be wrong), > > IF so this is pretty much a no-go. > > I suppose this has been asked/suggested before, but how about changing rpm so > that its spec file parser doesn't error out but rather issues a big warning > when it sees a tag like structure it doesn't understand, and ignores it? Or allow RPM field names to be listed in a configuration file. The ones which RPM doesn't recognize, but which are in the file, are ignored. You break compatibility once, but allow future versions of RPM to handle all future tags with relative ease (just add them to the configuration file of earlier versions). Did that make sense ..... Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
