Re: Draft guidelines for approving provenpackager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 17:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>  +1
> 
> There's an open ticket at FESCo to look into abuse of provenpackager
> lockout, I really hope they'll look into this soon.

This reseeding is in fact part of the result of that looking into.  The
provenpackager group being too big and filled with people who maintain
an arbitrary amount of packages was a big reason why some folks didn't
open their packages.  By rebooting the group with people we've already
had a human review of, and then supplying guidelines for those people to
bring more into the group, we can keep the group to just those that
genuinely want to help, and have had some human trust level applied.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux