2009/1/22 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>: > So we're actually in a better place for alpha than I thought we'd be. > Installer, which we care most about for Alpha, is in a good place and > working well, for the most part. There are a couple lingering issues, > some with work arounds, some without (ppc) but if we wanted to, we could > take the current frozen content and produce the bits for Alpha. Only > our release date is a week from Tuesday, which would put Alpha a bit > long in the tooth. > > Since we've got installer where we want it, and rawhide itself isn't too > terrible (minus the sqlite issue today), I'm considering a refresh of > the alpha tag on Tuesday and making the Alpha from that content. This > of course depends on rawhide not destroying itself in the next few days, > but we can make a judgment call on Tuesday for that. > > Thoughts? I would love that personally, it will give me some time to test the btrfs part of the install to make sure any other random issues are mostly worked out. I know its not an important part or anything, but it would be nice for something thats been advertised to not completely throw up on an unsuspecting tester. Thanks, Josef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
