Kevin Kofler wrote:
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
It's the packager/maintainer/developer and only them that make this
decision.
Then the decision should be made through a channel of
packagers/maintainers/developers (or maybe their representatives, i.e.
FESCo), not in a QA meeting!
If maintainer decides not to participate and then finds him disliking
the end result then he got nobody else to blame but him self.
If you want maintainers to take the decision, a QA meeting is the wrong
venue.
Kevin Kofler
If you and others think this decision should be in the hand of FESCo
instead of QA
then I would like FESCo to add this topic to their next meeting agenda
and I truly
hope they can reach a satisfying result.
The QA meeting topic as I see it was just about counting the votes on
the thread
and make that an official decision.
I also see that asking the maintainers for what they wanted was an error
on my behalf.
Testers need training guidelines and policies to work by, a proper "work
flow" and if the
responses to every matter are going to be like this one I simply cut out
the inefficient process.
I will write those guidelines policy and provide testers with a decent
work flow.
Anyone that opposes anything in that guideline can than pick out
questionable issues , make them to a topic on this
list or ask FESCo to address those issue(s) in their meetings.
There will be no time "pressure" matter since the guideline has already
been written and made
so debates can be stuck in infinite loop until the storage space on the
mail server fills up..
When and if an actually satisfying result comes out of it, a person can
simply log into the wiki and adjust the
the guidelines to that result..
With this approach testers will at least have something in their hand to
work with
which will indeed improve the overall process of bug reporting.
Thank you for your time.
JBG
/*JFDI to da bone.. */
begin:vcard
fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson
n:Gudmundsson;Johann B.
org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management
adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland
email;internet:johannbg@xxxxx
title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA
tel;work:+3545254267
tel;fax:+3545528801
tel;pager:N/A
tel;home:N/A
tel;cell:N/A
url:www.rhi.hi.is
version:2.1
end:vcard
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
