On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, actually, the version number is really an indication of the > lowest version that is compatible with the elisp that you're about to > generate - nothing changed in this regard between 22.1 and 22.2 (or > 22.3). > > Within the buildsystem, the hardcoded versions here are never used, as > the true version is found at package build time. However, those stupid > hardcoded versions are there to stop the building of SRPMs breaking > prior to package building - BuildRequires aren't satisfied when the > SRPM is built, so pkg-config isn't present. > > So, yeah, no harm in those updates, but not a big deal. > > [Aside: I am in the process of adding RPM macros to simplify this > rather messy pkg-config use, once that is in place I'll propose > changes to the guidelines.] > > J. Okay. However, the XEmacs paths are still wrong. Can those be fixed in the meantime? Thanks, -- Jerry James http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
