Re: ibus and F11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Pete Zaitcev" <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From the standpoint of Fedora's architecture in general, I am
> concerned with an emerging pattern of trying to fix issues by
> rewriting everything.
> Sure, IIIMF was a disaster and had to go, but SCIM is not that bad.
> For me, as a user, it's difficult to estimate just how big the
> advantage in maintainability is.

You have to understand that input methods projects are not big.
SCIM has architectural limitations that stop us doing things we
want to.  Fixing those would largely mean rewriting it anyway.

Jens

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux