Re: NFS tcp wrapper situation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:18:45 -0500, Warren Togami wrote

> * This is inconsistent with iptables.  "iptables -A INPUT -p tcp
> --dport 22 -s badhost.example.com -j REJECT" might also fail to
> reject an incoming connection under similar DNS-related conditions.
> It would be clearly wrong for sshd to second-guess and parse iptables
> rules, and make its own decision based its own reverse DNS query
> matching hostnames found in those iptables rules.  Why is it OK to
> second guess tcp wrappers but not iptables?

Wait a second. iptables does not support hostnames the same way
tcpwrappers does. The userspace component may, but name resolution is
done on rule creation, not on rule matching later on.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux