Casey Dahlin пишет:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) (forum@xxxxxxxxx) said:
As was mentioned in there discussion I want package it and push to
Fedora (it is open source and maintained). So, main question - is it
normal situation have second package (I intend call it like
apache-itk) with one source, which used in other rpm (apache) in
repository? Is really there any legal issues or etc.?
I don't think shipping separate rebuilds of core system daemons that
consist of adding 66k of non-upstream patch is a good idea.
Bill
seconded. If it isn't good enough for upstream we don't want it.
Hmm. May you more explain why??
We have many packages with completely dead upstream. I'm not sure, but
may be it is even not be presented apache upstream.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
