Tomas Mraz (tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > - a compatiblity openssl098g package? > I do not see a real need for such package except the third party > software support. We do not do compatibility packages for many other > important libraries either. But if anyone wants to maintain it feel free > to submit it for review and cc-me on the bugzilla entry, I will happily > review it. I'm just wondering if it's worth it even just as a crutch-to-keep-rawhide -functional in cases like these. Aside from that, I guess the only other reason to have it is for software built on F9/F10. There's certainly some of that, but I don't know how much. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
