Re: asciidoc abandoned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Jon Ciesla (limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > I've got an annoying bug in asciidoc (#283351; yes, it is quite old by
> > > now), and I check regularly on that one, there being no movement there
> > > except for automagic assignment to the stable releases. The current
> > > package
> > > is still asciidoc-8.2.5-2.fc9.noarch in Fedora, while upstream it is now
> > > at
> > > 8.3.3. In any case, the homepage warns of possible compatibility issues
> > > WRT
> > > 8.2.7. They look relatively minor to me, but in any case I believe Fedora
> > > 11 should ship the new version.
> > 
> > Looks like Chris Wright owns it, and Florian La Roche did quite a bit with
> > it, but nothing since 2007.  Would either care to comment?
> 
> Horst, you've done most bug filing, you interested in helping maintain
> the package?

I'm interested.

Note that I'm currently Fedora Ambassador (not a developer (yet?)), and not
really versed in Python.

Where should I start reading?
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux