On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 02:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > they don't help the problem at all, they just introduce a whole other > > set of difficulties as to what the default behavior should be when we > > hit them. > > Here's how I see things (which I believe is close if not identical to how it > works on Debian): > > Recommended = default on. > Suggested = default off. > The user can customize it to have both on or both off. > > And in both cases, removing a package with only a soft dep should not remove > the dependent package (except if an option to treat them as hard deps is > set). Right, I just don't see the above making our situation any better at all. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
