Re: asciidoc abandoned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright wrote:
> Fine by me.  Just need to double check at least git against it.

FWIw, in F-10 and devel, git's manpages already have some oddities
which I believe come from either docbook-style-xsl or xmlto.

I thought that defining DOCBOOK_XSL_172 in the git build had fixed the
issues, but noticed later that it caused another one. :/

I mentioned this on git list the other day, so hopefully someone who
knows the whole ugly doc generation tool-chain can help find a fix.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/105583/focus=105589

Who knows, maybe an asciidoc update will magically fix the problems?

...Now, where did I leave my pipe...

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you haven't the strength to impose your own terms upon life, you
must accept the terms it offers you.
    -- T.S. Eliot

Attachment: pgpyEBL9D18PU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux