On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:18 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > I think a more heretical categorization and classification of the > software package may have merit as a reference service for developers > looking for the 'right' development library for their project. But I > think that sort of thing would really requiring developing informed > opinions about mature library classification concepts as a guide. Or just search the intersection of tags "library" + "python" + "dowhatimean". Or "library" + "c" + "bubblesort". > We > could spend years debating traditional brick and mortar library > cataloguing system and still not come to agreement over adapting Bliss > or Library of Congress style classification. Or just let the crowd have at it with tags.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
