Re: TeX font package naming guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 14:02 -0300, Horst H. von Brand a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > ctan-some-package-fonts-common
> > ctan-some-package-roman-fonts
> > 
> > according to the draft for the fonts part.
> 
> Sounds wrong... either all fonts-foo or all bar-fonts, not mix and
> match. Please?

The -fonts packages are real font packages
The srpm-common is an utility package with no fonts inside (common stuff
like directory ownership, documentation, etc), so it's actually good it
has a different naming than packages with fonts in them.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29
-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux