CC-ing a few more TEX folks Le Mer 14 janvier 2009 12:09, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit : > > Hello, > > Recently an effort has begun to the system infrastructure in fedora > aware of each font shipped, and this shipment explicit mostly through > subpackages > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) > > Two of my packages are fonts primarily intended for LaTeX > (tetex-font-kerkis and tetex-font-cm-lgc). The guidelines suggest > splitting the package in the Type 1 font files and TeX-support files. > > The font-related part is mostly sorted out (see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 ) > > The TeX-related part consists of files (.sty, .tfm, .ovf, etc) to > support the use of these fonts in LaTeX. > > Now, the draft for font naming guidelines suggests the srpm name to > changed from tetex-font-cm-lgc to ctan-cm-lgc-fonts (to which I > agree). > > The reason for this email is the last line in the proposed table, > where > the TeX related subpackage is to be named ctan-cm-lgc-tex. I think > this > is inconsistent with the rest of the TeX world in fedora and would > like > some feedback as to what name would be preferable. > > My preference would be to put tex as a prefix and drop ctan as in > tex-cm-lgc as it is rather obvious for TeX-related stuff; afterall we > don't have many perl-cpan-perlmodule packages) > > What do other TeX packagers prefer? > > P.S. The only hint I found at existing guidelines is that the prefix > tex- is preferable > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28TeX.29 > > -- Sarantis -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
